Moral Judgement And Moral Relativism Essay - 1966 Words

Moral luck coexists with moral skepticism to support moral relativism. If a person cannot have any moral knowledge then it is luck that will determine the outcome. If a person had vast moral knowledge, they would be able to see or predict a close shot of the outcome of a situation that involves moral choices. If this person does not know anything about morals, then it is up to that persons luck to determine the outcome of the moral choice. According to Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, â€Å"Moral luck occurs when an agent can be correctly treated as an object of moral judgment despite the fact that a significant aspect of what she is assessed for depends on factors beyond her control.†(Nelkin,2004); Since it is up to moral luck to choose in moral choices, there cannot be any moral facts because it is luck that determines what the outcome will be. There is more than one type of luck, there is Circumstantial Luck, Resultant Luck Causal, Luck Constitutive Luck, and Everybodyà ¢â‚¬â„¢s luck is different so there can be no moral facts, therefore supporting moral relativism. To begin with, in Allegory of the cave in the book A Guided Tour of Five Works by Plato, written by Christopher Biffle, there is a scenario that follows moral luck leading into moral luck. The children from the allegory that were chosen to live in this cave had no idea that they were going to be subjected to such living conditions. They did not have the choice to choose how they were going to be treated, but theyShow MoreRelatedRelativism Vs Realism953 Words   |  4 PagesJoseph Cipullo Professor Butera Philosophy 103 October 28, 2017 Relativism or Realism What is Plato’s reasoning for rejecting moral relativism in favor of moral realism? Moral Relativism is defined as the view that moral judgements are true and false only relative to some particular standpoint and no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others. An interpretation of moral relativism is that it is an understanding that the ethical position of right or wrong is culturally centeredRead MoreNormative Ethical Relativism716 Words   |  3 PagesThe objective of this essay is to provide reasons as to why normative ethical relativism provides an unattractive view on the nature of morality and why it should be rejected. In order to see this negative relationship, this essay will identify three features of this theory that makes it problematic. The first problematic feature of normative ethical relativism is based on the claim that moral principles cannot be validated on a universal level. This means that different cultures should be freeRead MoreThe Pros And Cons Of Moral Relativism840 Words   |  4 Pagessaid, â€Å"We are moving towards a dictatorship of relativism which does not recognize anything as for certain and which has as its highest goal one’s own ego and one’s own desires.† When discussing the idea of Moral Relativism there are conflicting arguments as to if it is true in society or not. As much as Americans wish to ignore it, and although it has negative as well as positive effects, moral relativism is apparent all over the world. Moral Relativism is true and relevant today through individualsRead MoreMoral Relativism And Moral Morality1627 Words   |  7 PagesThere are two different branches of moral realism. One, moral absolutism which means that in any situation a person is in, no m atter the circumstances their morals stay the same every single time. Two, moral pluralism and this can be described as a person having all of their moral values. In addition to, abiding by their moral values, they also have to abide by their moral guidelines. This can be hard because at times they can conflict, but if any situation where you have to provide yourself withRead MoreCultural Relativism784 Words   |  4 PagesCultural Relativism stems from the concept that numerous cultures possess individualistic and varying moral codes. In this paper, I will argue that cultural relativism is deemed as invalid. In respect to my argument, I will discuss its invalidity due to four varying concepts: non-excusable and excusable actions, morality of individuals, chaos, and the fact that not forming a judgement is still a judgement. The first point that reinforces the idea that cultural relativism is invalid pertains to theRead MoreQuestions On Personal Morals And Ethics956 Words   |  4 PagesSticking to Personal Morals in Business In today’s business world, the issue of personal morals and ethics has been a much researched and debated topic. This is particularly true in light of the many financial scandals of the past few years. Therefore, one must decide, when faced with a moral decision, if she will remain true to her engrained morals or waver to reap special benefits in the long run. Personally, adhering to established morals and ethics is the basis of my entire being and professionalRead MoreMoral Relativism And The Ethical Dilemma1615 Words   |  7 Pagesabout moral relativism and realised that this might be a way to explain how a â€Å"wrong† choice can sometimes be a â€Å"right† one, or at least to the person acting on it. Moral Relativism â€Å"The view that moral judgements are true or false only relative to some particular standpoint†¦and that no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Westacott, date unknown) The foundations of the concept of moral relativism were first expressed in 5th Century Greece; prior to this the idea of morals couldRead MoreEthical Concepts And Principles Of Business Ethics1673 Words   |  7 Pagesthe fundamental ethical concepts and principles to conduct business in an ethical way. 2) What is the difference between â€Å"relativism of judgments† and â€Å"relativism of standards†? Provide an example of your own to illustrate. (7 points) Ethical relativism is a moral compass to the norms of a culture. That is, whether an action is judged to be right or wrong, depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced. The same action may be morally right in one society however, morally wrongRead MoreConflicting Moral Arguments : Louis Vaughn s Philosophy, Moral Relativism And Moral Objectivism872 Words   |  4 PagesConflicting Moral Arguments Louis Vaughn states that the purpose of morality is not to describe how things are, but to â€Å"prescribe how things should be† (2). In Philosophy, moral relativism and moral objectivism are two conflicting but somewhat overlapping school of thought. These beliefs govern the way an individual acts; they also decide the ethical guidelines from which the law is written. In this essay we will delineate the differences between the two sects of belief. Pojman asserts that manyRead MoreThe Ethics Of The Ethical Systems872 Words   |  4 Pagesconcerning our morals: Relativism Ethics, Consequentialism Ethics, Deontological Ethics, and Virtue Ethics. These four theories attempt to define what right and wrong should be and how one should handle any situation. There are many strengths and weaknesses of each view. The goal is to determine which theory is the best by exploring real world situations and questioning the claims that just don’t work out. RELATIVISM ETHICS There are two different types of relativistic views: Cultural Relativism and Subjectivism